Quiz
Questions: |
| |
|
| 1. |
The
definition of the dead load is: The
definition of dead load in ASCE 7-98
is ".the weight of all materials of
construction incorporated into the
building, including but not limited
to walls, floors, roofs, ceilings,
stairways, built-in partitions, finishes,
cladding, and other similarly incorporated
architectural and structural items,
and fixed service equipment." The
sum of the dead loads of all the individual
components will equal the unoccupied
weight of the building. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 2.
|
Determining
dead loads is important for several
reasons: |
| |
|
- Foundation size (e.g., footing
width, pile embedment depth, number
of piles) depends partly on dead
load.
- Dead load counterbalances uplift
forces due to buoyancy and wind.
- Dead load counterbalances wind
and earthquake overturning moments.
- Dead load changes the response
of the building to both seismic
forces and impact forces generated
by floating objects.
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 3. |
The
design flood will always be greater
than or equal base flood. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 4. |
Hydrostatic
loads occur when standing or slowly
moving water comes into contact with
a building or building component.
Hydrostatic loads can act laterally
or vertically, and the forces they
exert include buoyant or flotation
forces. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 5. |
Wave
forces can be separated into four
categories: |
| |
|
- Foundation size (e.g., footing
width, pile embedment depth, number
of piles) depends partly on dead
load.
- Those from non-breaking waves
(these forces can usually be computed
as hydrostatic forces against
walls and hydrodynamic forces
against piles)
- Those from breaking waves (these
forces will be of short duration,
but large magnitude)
- Those from broken waves (these
forces are similar to hydrodynamic
forces caused by flowing or surging
water)
- Uplift (these forces are often
caused by wave run-up, deflection,
or peaking against the underside
of horizontal surfaces)
|
| |
|
Of
these, the forces from breaking waves
are the highest and produce the most
severe loads. Therefore, this manual
strongly recommends that the breaking
wave load be used as the design wave
load. |
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 6. |
Waves
and currents during coastal flood
conditions are capable of creating
turbulence around foundation elements,
and causing localized scour around
those elements. Determining potential
scour is critical in designing coastal
foundations to ensure that failure
during and after flooding does not
occur as a result of the loss in either
bearing capacity or anchoring resistance
around the posts, piles, piers, columns,
footings, or walls. Localized scour
determinations will require knowledge
of the flood depth, flow conditions,
soil characteristics, and foundation
type. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 7. |
The
design process involves the following: |
| |
|
- Determining design loads
- Determining the building's foundation,
structural frame, and envelope
- Determining the connections
between individual elements
- Determining the elevation, placement,
and support for utilities
- Selecting the appropriate materials
|
| |
|
The
entire design process is based on
the fundamental premise that anticipated
service and natural hazard loads can
and must be transferred through the
building in a continuous path to the
supporting soils. ANY weakness in
that continuous path is a potential
point of failure of the building,
and any failure creates the possibility
for large property losses and the
potential for loss of life. |
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 8. |
The
types of loads that most commonly
act on one- to three-story residential
buildings during severe natural hazard
events are as follows: |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
- dead loads
- live loads
- flood loads
- wind loads
- earthquake (seismic) loads
- snow loads
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 9. |
The
dead loads are; the weight of the
building and accessory equipment such
as tanks, piping, electrical service
panels and conduits, and HVAC equipment. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 10. |
The
live loads are; combined loads of
occupants, furnishings, and non-fixed
equipment. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 11. |
Flood
loads are based on flood depth and
velocity, wave effects, expected long-term
and short-term erosion as well as
localized scour, elevation of the
building in relationship to the expected
flood conditions, and floating debris
impacts. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 12. |
Wind
loads are based on Roof shape and
pitch, sitting, topography and exposure,
and building shape and orientation.
The height of the structure also needs
to be assessed. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 13. |
Seismic
loads are calculated based on mass
(including elevation, location, and
distribution) of the building, soil
supporting the building, height of
the building above the ground, and
additional loads that the building
may occasionally support (e.g., snow). |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 14. |
Snow
loads are based on roof shape and
pitch, multi-level roofs, and building
orientation. Also, drifting snow may
cause unbalanced loading on the roof
system |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 15. |
The
following concepts show how one design
step leads to the next: |
| |
|
- All design loads create forces
in and on the building. The forces
are transferred through load paths.
- Load paths always end in the
soil that supports the structure.
- Loads should be applied to the
building beginning at the top.
- Loads should be determined for
both the vertical and horizontal
load paths.
- Load transfer creates forces
at connections and imparts stresses
materials. Connections and materials
must be strong enough to those
forces and stresses.
- The load path must be continuous;
any break or weakness in the path
"chain" can result in damage or
even structural failure.
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 16. |
The
following failure modes are: |
| |
|
- Uplift: Vertical
forces caused by wind or buoyancy
exceed the weight of the structure
and the strength of the soil anchorage.
The building fails by being lifted
off its foundation or because
the foundation pulls out of the
soil.
- Overturning:
The applied moments caused by
wind, wave, earthquake, and buoyancy
forces exceed the resisting moments
of the building's weight and anchorage.
The building fails by rotating
off its foundation or because
the foundation rotates out of
the soil.
- Sliding or Shearing:
Horizontal forces exceed the friction
force or strength of the foundation.
The building fails by sliding
off its foundation, by shear failure
of components transferring loads
to its foundation, or by the foundation
sliding.
|
| |
|
|
Primary failure
mode |
| |
|
|
Secondary failure
mode |
| |
|
|
|
| 17. |
According
to table 12.6 if you are nailing on
the panel edges of the roof, the spacing
for the nails in Zone I should be
: |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
3 inches apart |
| |
|
|
4 inches apart |
| |
|
|
8 inches apart |
| |
|
|
|
| 18. |
In
figures 12.74 the purpose of the link
#2 connection between the roof rafter
and the top plate of the exterior
wall is: |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
It seems like
a good way to connect the roof to
the wall |
| |
|
|
To add shear strength and resist the
uplift and lateral load. |
| |
|
|
|
| 19. |
Figure
12.83 shows how the fire-resistant
walls and roof of one house helped
it survived a wildfire surrounding
houses were destroyed. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 20. |
Figure
13.3 and 13.4 show an example of improperly
and properly notched foundation pile. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 21. |
Which
one of the following tasks should
be considered when examining the site
soils before designing the foundation. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Soil borings |
| |
|
|
A review of borings
from nearby sites |
| |
|
|
A test pit dug
at or near one of the pilings or foundation
corners |
| |
|
|
Information from
the local office of the Natural Resource
Conservation Service
(formerly Soil Conservation Service)
and Soil Surveys published for each
county |
| |
|
|
Test piles |
| |
|
|
All of the above |
| |
|
|
|
| 22. |
Diagonal
bracing strengthens and stiffens the
pile foundation at the cost of greater
exposure to wave and debris impact. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 23. |
The
following is a top foundation issue
for builders |
| |
|
- Piles, piers, or columns must
be properly aligned.
- The piles, piers, or columns
must be driven or placed at the
proper elevation to resist failure
and must extend below the expected
depth of scour and erosion.
- Foundation materials must be
flood damage-resistant (pressure
treated wood, masonry, concrete).
- Provide adequate support at
the top of the foundation element
to properly attach the floor framing
system. Do not notch a wood foundation
element more than 50 percent of
its cross-sectional area.
- Breakaway walls are intended
to fail; do not overnail these
walls to the foundations; do not
install utilities or other obstructions
behind these walls; do not finish
inside these walls.
- Where foundation elements are
masonry or concrete (except slabson-
grade), place the proper size
of reinforcing, the proper number
of steel bars, and provide the
proper concrete cover over the
steel.
- Exposed steel in the foundation
will corrode; plan for it by installing
hot-dipped galvanized or stainless
steel.
- Areas of pressure-treated wood
that have been cut or drilled
will retain water and will decay;
treat these cut areas in the field.
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 24. |
In
figure 13.26 the purpose of full length
board sheathing is:. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
To transfer more
of the shear loads between the frame
joists |
| |
|
|
To cover the building. |
| |
|
|
|
| 25. |
In
coastal structures the key to reduced
long-term maintenance is the initial
selection of appropriate materials
and proper construction. Maintenance
and repair demands will be directly
influenced by decisions made during
building design and construction. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 26. |
To
maintain maximum building performance,
a coastal building’s structural
system and envelope (i.e., exterior
wall covering, doors, windows, and
roof covering) must not be allowed
to deteriorate. If the building is
significantly degraded by corrosion,
wood decay, termite attack, or weathering,
its vulnerability to damage from natural
hazards is increased. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 27. |
The
likelihood of termite infestation
in coastal buildings can be reduced
by maintenance that makes the building
site drier and otherwise less hospitable
to termites: |
| |
|
- Store firewood and other wood
items, including wood mulch, on
the ground, away from the building.
- Keep gutters and downspouts
in good repair and positioned
to direct water away from the
building.
- Keep water pipes, water fixtures,
and drainpipes in good repair.
- Avoid dampness in crawlspaces
by providing adequate ventilation
or installing impervious ground
cover membranes.
- Avoid frequent plant watering
adjacent to the house, and keep
plants trimmed away from the walls.
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 28. |
The
combined effects of sun and water
on many building materials, particularly
wood, cause weathering effects, which
include the following: |
| |
|
- Fading of finishes
- Accelerated checking and splitting
of wood
- Gradual loss of thickness of
wood
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
| 29. |
In
case #7 (of Ethics section); It was
alleged that Dr. Smith conducted an
engineering inspection for his client
in December 1998; but did not provide
his client with his inspection report
until February 2000. This Indicated
that he was not acting as a faithful
agent for his client and his actions
were not in keeping with generally
accepted engineering standards and
procedures. The Board accepted a Consent
Order signed by Dr. Smith for a formal
reprimand. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 30. |
In
case #11 (of Ethics section); It was
alleged that Mr. Doe, a Texas PE engineer,
altered boundary information on Survey
plats for a subdivision that had been
prepared by a license surveyor, affixed
a copy of the surveyor’s seal
to the plats and submitted the plats
to county officials for approval without
knowledge of the surveyor. The Board
reportedly suspended his license for
one year and fined him $1000.00 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 31. |
In
case #15 (of Ethics section); It was
alleged that Jim, the company’s
president, designed seven swimming
pools and affixed a copy of a Texas
Professional engineer’s seal
and signature that he had obtained
from another source to the plan sheets
which were submitted to a city for
permitting. Board records did not
show that Jim was licensed as a professional
engineer in Texas nor that his company
had Texas professional engineer as
a regular full-time employee. The
Board accepted an Agreed Board Order
signed by Jim to cease and desist
from any and all representations that
his company can offer and/or perform
engineering services and from the
actual performance of engineering
services until such time as the company
hires a Texas licensed professional
engineer as a regular full time employee,
and to immediately discontinue the
use of the Texas professional engineer’s
seal and signature on any and all
documents. Jim also agreed to hire
a Texas professional engineer to perform
after the fact engineering inspections
and issue certification reports for
the five swimming pools that were
permitted and constructed. The company
was also ordered to pay a $5000.00
administrative penalty. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 32. |
In
case #17; John was a registered engineer
in: |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Texas |
| |
|
|
Michigan |
| |
|
|
New Mexico |
| |
|
|
|
| 33. |
In
case #21; It was alleged that Billy
signed his name and affixed his Texas
Architectural seal to structural,
mechanical, electrical and plumbing
design plans for renovation of a commercial
building. Based upon the size of the
building, the structural, mechanical,
electrical and plumbing designs were
required by law to have been performed
by a licensed professional engineer;
therefore Billy’s preparation
of these design plans constituted
the unlawful practice of engineering.
The Board accepted a consent order
signed by Billy and his attorney agreeing
that Billy will not practice engineering
outside the exemption listed in the
Engineering practice Act and will
refrain from making any and all representations
that he can offer and/or perform engineering
services until such time as he hires
a Texas licensed professional engineer
as a regular full time employee or
until such time as he becomes a Texas
licensed professional engineer. Billy
also agreed to pay a $1000.00 administrative
penalty. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 34. |
In
case #6; It was alleged that Jim provided
professional engineering design services
in connection with residential foundation
design and exterior wall systems during
a period when his Texas engineer license
was expired. The Board accepted a
Consent Order signed by Jim for a
two-year probated suspension of his
Texas engineer license contingent
upon his payment of a $2000.00 administrative
penalty. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| 35. |
In
case #24; John-David-Bill, Inc. It
was alleged that site grading and
drainage plans for two projects were
submitted to the city of Brownsville,
one set bearing John’s signature
and architect seal and the other bearing
David’s signature and architectural
seal. The size and scope of the respective
projects required that Texas licensed
professional engineers prepare the
grading and the drainage design plans.
Board records did not show any of
the three were licensed as professional
engineers in Texas nor that their
company had any regular full time
employee who was licensed as professional
engineers in Texas. Therefore it appears
these individuals unlawfully performed
engineering services and their respective
plans were an unlawful representation
of their company ability to offer
and /or perform engineering services.
The Board accepted a Consent order
signed by the president of the company
to cease and desist from practice
of engineering and from any and all
representations that the company can
offer of performing engineering services
until the such time as the firm hires
a full time employee who is licensed
as a professional engineer in Texas.
The company also agreed to pay a $2000.00
administrative penalty. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
True |
| |
|
|
False |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|